Amazingly, sex-specific DNA recovered from lighter, more breakable, eggshells suggest that in these species it was the smaller and lighter males that did most of the incubating. Brian then looked at large groups of eggshell fragments collected from single localities, taking one thickness measurement from each of many fragments.
Looking at 6,000 eggshell fragments from 13 North Island sites, Brian found that the shells were 0.54–1.74 mm thick. South Island moa eggshell is up to 1.89 mm thick, which overlaps with the thickness of ostrich eggs.
There seemed to be a connection between the spread and relative abundance of shell thicknesses at a site and the presence or absence of moa species of different sizes, as determined by the moa bones recovered at the same site. Where there were moa bones, the eggs related to their species were not far away. For example, at Tokerau Beach, Northland, a sample of 1042 eggshell fragments collected over many years in the sand-dunes was about 80% "thin" shell (<1.1 mm thick) and 20% "thick" shell (≥1.1 mm thick). We already know from bones found in the area that there were smaller species of moa living in this part of the country, with larger moa being much rarer. This means that a sample of eggshell thicknesses at a site can stand in for what we might know from analyses of bones. Moa eggshell fragments have therefore a greater importance in helping us to understand the past distribution of moa species at natural sites, or their frequency in the diet of early Māori at archaeological sites.